Saturday, August 30, 2003
Hey, so I'm decently good with grammar and stuff. Seriously. If you ever read a post which doesn't make sense, or has some obvious spelling errors or whatever, hit reload a few times. Hey, I said if the post is incoherent, not shitty. I have this habit of writing a post, posting it, then proofreading it. I tend to do about 200 iterations before I get the post just how I want it.
Why do I do this? Basically because this allows me to have my shitty website on the "10 Most Recently Published Blogs" list on one of Blogger's webpages over and over again. So far, it's one of the best marketing tactics I've come up with, because it seems to generate a decent number of hits. Sometimes, I'll just make a minor change or no change at all just to get the link up there.
Hey, don't call me desperate for attention, pigfucker.
Okay, seriously, I'm going to bed now.
Why do I do this? Basically because this allows me to have my shitty website on the "10 Most Recently Published Blogs" list on one of Blogger's webpages over and over again. So far, it's one of the best marketing tactics I've come up with, because it seems to generate a decent number of hits. Sometimes, I'll just make a minor change or no change at all just to get the link up there.
Hey, don't call me desperate for attention, pigfucker.
Okay, seriously, I'm going to bed now.
Posted by
Well, different
@
05:48
Okay, so remember my probably mostly useless WWDN ad campaign? I don't know why I'm bringing that up, expcept maybe to put in context the fact that WWDN has text ads. Of course, if you know about my ad, you already know this fact. Either way, why you would give a fuck, I don't know, but it's past 5 AM, and I'm not exactly what we'd call "fully coherent." No, not drunk or in any other chemically altered state, just tired. So you're like, "why don't you just fucking go to sleep, dumbass?" And I'm like, "well, I would, if you'd get off my fucking ass and let me finish this post."
Huh? What the fuck was I talking about? Oh yeah.
Anyway, I come across this text ad that says some bullshit like "When was the last time... she totally melted for you?" And I'm saying to myself, what? I never dated the Wicked Witch of the West. But for the fuck of it, I decided to see what the hell it was about.
You know what it turns out this cocksucker is selling? A book on how to score with women. You know what the first thing that comes to mind is? Those shitty advice articles in Maxim, Stuff, and the like on how to score with women. God, are those things pathetic. About the only thing more pathetic has gotta be the guy who follows those advice articles. I knew a guy who thought those magazines gave good advice; he's dead now.
Honestly, if I'm going to crash and burn, which I will on the rare occasion I muster up the courage to talk to someone I'm interested in, I might as well crash and burn on my own lack of skills. No sense crashing and burning on someone else's lack of skills.
To cast aside sarcasm for a minute (don't get too used to this), it's bullshit like this that has me disillusioned on the whole dating thing anyway. It seems like it's all about playing games, and not being yourself. The fact that Maxim advice and stupid books like the one I came across this morning are a testament to that. Granted, I'm not going to get anyone being myself. I know you must be saying "What? A nice, personable, mild-mannered guy like you?" (see, sarcasm's back). But as Captain Picard said, "If we're going to be damned, let's be damned for who we really are." Oh, yeah. Star Trek quotes. That gets 'em wet.
Okay, enough self-deprecation and feeling sorry for myself. On with the show.
What always makes me laugh and roll my eyes is that a lot of those surefire pussy getters are written by a "woman," so you instantly know it must work if it was written by a woman. I think I would actually trust it less if it were written by a woman. Seriously, I would just say to myself "Okay, maybe this works... On her." This isn't a crack on women, but they're all so different and can't make up their minds anyway, making one woman's advice is completely useless when applied to another woman. One woman likes this, another woman likes that. There's just no consistency to make most "advice" worthwhile.
Okay, so I guess that was kind of a crack on women. Why you gotta be like 'dat, baby?
Huh? What the fuck was I talking about? Oh yeah.
Anyway, I come across this text ad that says some bullshit like "When was the last time... she totally melted for you?" And I'm saying to myself, what? I never dated the Wicked Witch of the West. But for the fuck of it, I decided to see what the hell it was about.
You know what it turns out this cocksucker is selling? A book on how to score with women. You know what the first thing that comes to mind is? Those shitty advice articles in Maxim, Stuff, and the like on how to score with women. God, are those things pathetic. About the only thing more pathetic has gotta be the guy who follows those advice articles. I knew a guy who thought those magazines gave good advice; he's dead now.
Honestly, if I'm going to crash and burn, which I will on the rare occasion I muster up the courage to talk to someone I'm interested in, I might as well crash and burn on my own lack of skills. No sense crashing and burning on someone else's lack of skills.
To cast aside sarcasm for a minute (don't get too used to this), it's bullshit like this that has me disillusioned on the whole dating thing anyway. It seems like it's all about playing games, and not being yourself. The fact that Maxim advice and stupid books like the one I came across this morning are a testament to that. Granted, I'm not going to get anyone being myself. I know you must be saying "What? A nice, personable, mild-mannered guy like you?" (see, sarcasm's back). But as Captain Picard said, "If we're going to be damned, let's be damned for who we really are." Oh, yeah. Star Trek quotes. That gets 'em wet.
Okay, enough self-deprecation and feeling sorry for myself. On with the show.
What always makes me laugh and roll my eyes is that a lot of those surefire pussy getters are written by a "woman," so you instantly know it must work if it was written by a woman. I think I would actually trust it less if it were written by a woman. Seriously, I would just say to myself "Okay, maybe this works... On her." This isn't a crack on women, but they're all so different and can't make up their minds anyway, making one woman's advice is completely useless when applied to another woman. One woman likes this, another woman likes that. There's just no consistency to make most "advice" worthwhile.
Okay, so I guess that was kind of a crack on women. Why you gotta be like 'dat, baby?
Posted by
Well, different
@
05:32
Friday, August 29, 2003
Man, have the last few gas fill-ups been painful. I just love being dependent on foreign oil. Well, I'm always torn between wanting to complain, and realizing that it's like Bill Maher says - gas prices may go up, but when you think about it, it's not all that bad. I do a lot of driving, but I'm fortunate enough to get better gas mileage than god in my car.
It'd just be nice if we could get our shit together and not have to worry so much about it. I'm not really even that concerned with paying more for gas, I'm more concerned with how this country has sould its soul for cheap oil. Concerned with all the fucking trouble we get ourselves into to keep the oil companies and our Middle East "allies" happy. And just a teency bit worried what happens when we run out of dead dinosaurs to run our Ford Fuck You Mobiles.
It'd just be nice if we could get our shit together and not have to worry so much about it. I'm not really even that concerned with paying more for gas, I'm more concerned with how this country has sould its soul for cheap oil. Concerned with all the fucking trouble we get ourselves into to keep the oil companies and our Middle East "allies" happy. And just a teency bit worried what happens when we run out of dead dinosaurs to run our Ford Fuck You Mobiles.
Posted by
Well, different
@
18:04
You know what sucks? I can't find the "Tecmo Super Bowl Ate My Balls" webpage anymore. Also, it looks like quite a few of Krazy Keith's Ate My Balls links that we came across like 5 years ago are dead now. It's never going to be good again.
Posted by
Well, different
@
00:58
Thursday, August 28, 2003
So, time to give mad props to some more people who have written and/or linked me. I may be an asshole, but I at least try and give credit where credit is due. I don't know what's wrong with these people, but whatever it is I'm glad for it.
I got a great e-mail from Goody a few nights ago. In addition to the 'blog, her up and coming website is located here.
This guy thinks Fuck Everything is the "angriest blog on the planet." That, right there, is a compliment.
Finally, a big thanks to the 'blogmaster over at insinuendo for the front page link.
I got a great e-mail from Goody a few nights ago. In addition to the 'blog, her up and coming website is located here.
This guy thinks Fuck Everything is the "angriest blog on the planet." That, right there, is a compliment.
Finally, a big thanks to the 'blogmaster over at insinuendo for the front page link.
Posted by
Well, different
@
23:35
Yeah, we are so totally shithammered here. Is there any way we can turn this mess around? Hell, even if Bush is voted out of office, we still have this huge pile of rubbish that is going to have to be cleaned up.
Posted by
Well, different
@
23:18
Mississippi, in a surprise move...
It's sick how much support and publicity Moore is getting. Not like I'm helping, but not like keeping silent would change anything. Well, this bullshit worked for him once before, propelling him to the head of Alabama's Supreme court, so I'm sure he's thinking why not try it again?
"I had hoped and prayed that the courts would stand up for our rights..." Yeah, asshole, shouldn't that tell you that not even God is on your side?
It's sick how much support and publicity Moore is getting. Not like I'm helping, but not like keeping silent would change anything. Well, this bullshit worked for him once before, propelling him to the head of Alabama's Supreme court, so I'm sure he's thinking why not try it again?
"I had hoped and prayed that the courts would stand up for our rights..." Yeah, asshole, shouldn't that tell you that not even God is on your side?
Posted by
Well, different
@
21:27
So has anyone else been following the saga of Dr. David Kelly over in Britain? There's an inquiry into the affair going on right now, the Hutton Inquiry. For anyone who hasn't heard of this mess, at one point, the BBC was running a story saying that Tony Blair's government had "sexed up" its intelligence on Iraq, in particular a claim that Iraq could launch an attack within 45 minutes as part of the infamous "dossier" that Tony Blair presented. Of course, belief that intelligence on Iraq was doctored to make Iraq look like a bigger threat than it really was is nothing new, but it was leaked that the BBC's source was a British Ministry of Defence official. Dr. David Kelly, and MoD weapons advisor, was named as the BBC's source, a claim denied by the BBC. He began undergoing questioning by an inquiry board, and not too long after being thrust into the unpleasant spotlight, he was found dead in a field with his wrists slashed.
The Hutton Inquiry once again has Tony Blair in hot water. Like usual, I can't help but feel a little sorry for Tony. Maybe he really is just evil, but the guy is obviously smarter than some world leaders I can name, and he at least puts on a good show that he's helping us in Iraq because he really feels it's the right thing to do. Of course, I'm also convinced that he just wants to ride American coattails to glory, so in the end, whatever happens to him is his fault.
The thing that really pisses me off is that Tony Blair is taking all the heat for this issue alone. Bush, on the other hand, has had to deal with a little media badgering here and there, but hasn't had to put up with as much shit as Mr. Blair. I'm pretty sure that's the case, because I don't read as much British press as American, and it still seems like someone is always riding Tony's ass over Iraq, and probably rightly so. Still, I can't help but be irritated that the guy who seems intelligent and seems to at least partly be doing this for the right reasons is having to share the blame all alone. Meanwhile, our dumbass head of government (I hate referring to Bush as 'President', if you haven't noticed) who is fucking stupid and/or just plain evil isn't having anywhere near as difficult a time as he deserves.
The Hutton Inquiry once again has Tony Blair in hot water. Like usual, I can't help but feel a little sorry for Tony. Maybe he really is just evil, but the guy is obviously smarter than some world leaders I can name, and he at least puts on a good show that he's helping us in Iraq because he really feels it's the right thing to do. Of course, I'm also convinced that he just wants to ride American coattails to glory, so in the end, whatever happens to him is his fault.
The thing that really pisses me off is that Tony Blair is taking all the heat for this issue alone. Bush, on the other hand, has had to deal with a little media badgering here and there, but hasn't had to put up with as much shit as Mr. Blair. I'm pretty sure that's the case, because I don't read as much British press as American, and it still seems like someone is always riding Tony's ass over Iraq, and probably rightly so. Still, I can't help but be irritated that the guy who seems intelligent and seems to at least partly be doing this for the right reasons is having to share the blame all alone. Meanwhile, our dumbass head of government (I hate referring to Bush as 'President', if you haven't noticed) who is fucking stupid and/or just plain evil isn't having anywhere near as difficult a time as he deserves.
Posted by
Well, different
@
14:01
Wednesday, August 27, 2003
Holy fucking shit. I just fucking KNEW that I got stiffed way back in the 80's. This is what I've been waiting my whole life for. The Gadgetmobile. And it looks like it's in shitty condition, too. Bonus!
Posted by
Well, different
@
17:51
So you know how I'm always harping on how "The neocons are up to evil shit, but we never know until it's too late"? I haven't been real good on going on the offensive and reading more conservative press, obviously. Today though, I realized I may have already hit on the "next big thing" a long time ago.
I'm driving in to work today, and I can't get the words "single-party state" out of my head. I mentioned this before, way back on May 8th. In late June, Paul Krugman had an editorial in The New York Times about the possibility of becoming a one-party state. At least one journalist from a major newspaper has discussed this, so I know I can't be completely crazy for thinking it.
You don't think it's possible? We have a Republican President, a Republican House, and a Republican Senate. We have a press that seems to be terrified of going after the Republican-led government. We have a weak, divided "opposition" in the Democrats. Sounds like we could be well on our way.
Furthermore, we have a consolidation of power taking place. The Republicans got into office, and have used September 11th to galvanize their strength. September 11th could end up being our Reichstag fire.
Of course, we would never have a death camp, charismatic-leader type single party state. No, this is America, where we're good at illusion and lying to ourselves. The Democrats would still be around, but they'd be even more diminished than they are today. Propaganda is an obvious entity that we already have plenty of. There wouldn't be any "thought police," but plenty of pseudo-patriotic and religious rhetoric to try and keep us in line. Again, something we already have plenty of. And there would be plenty more bullshit efforts like the one to codify in law that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. One party enforcing their laws, their policies, their morals, and their beliefs.
The Republicans are smart, and they're patient - just like terrorists. They know that it's going to take some time to get where they want to be, and they're willing to work and to wait.
Everyone knows I'm not fond of the GOP, and I'm sure this just looks like yet another attack on them. But we cannot let the GOP become the "dominant governing party in the country for a generation" as Karl Rove would like. Effective single party rule would be indescribably bad, no matter where you are on the political spectrum. Of course, ask Republicans, and none of them would admit how much they'd love this single-party scenario. Just like a company that repeats the mantra of "competition is good," when they know full well how nice having a monopoly is when they can get away with it.
The only hope of putting a kink in their plans is to vote Bush out of office next November. It pains me to say it, because they're weak and I hate them too, but the Democrats are our only hope. The problem is, I'm afraid that if the Democrats actually started taking a stand and taking action, it could backfire and they could be left even weaker than before. The Republicans are masters of letting the Democrats fuck themselves, and I'm afraid that even if the Dems did the right thing, they could end up accelerating exactly what I fear. Furthermore, even if Bush was pushed out, it may not completely derail what's been going on, only delaying the inevitable.
I hope I am just crazy, and this is just the ranting of someone who doesn't know shit about politics. But we are so totally fucked if I'm right, so I'm not letting go of this.
I'm driving in to work today, and I can't get the words "single-party state" out of my head. I mentioned this before, way back on May 8th. In late June, Paul Krugman had an editorial in The New York Times about the possibility of becoming a one-party state. At least one journalist from a major newspaper has discussed this, so I know I can't be completely crazy for thinking it.
You don't think it's possible? We have a Republican President, a Republican House, and a Republican Senate. We have a press that seems to be terrified of going after the Republican-led government. We have a weak, divided "opposition" in the Democrats. Sounds like we could be well on our way.
Furthermore, we have a consolidation of power taking place. The Republicans got into office, and have used September 11th to galvanize their strength. September 11th could end up being our Reichstag fire.
Of course, we would never have a death camp, charismatic-leader type single party state. No, this is America, where we're good at illusion and lying to ourselves. The Democrats would still be around, but they'd be even more diminished than they are today. Propaganda is an obvious entity that we already have plenty of. There wouldn't be any "thought police," but plenty of pseudo-patriotic and religious rhetoric to try and keep us in line. Again, something we already have plenty of. And there would be plenty more bullshit efforts like the one to codify in law that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. One party enforcing their laws, their policies, their morals, and their beliefs.
The Republicans are smart, and they're patient - just like terrorists. They know that it's going to take some time to get where they want to be, and they're willing to work and to wait.
Everyone knows I'm not fond of the GOP, and I'm sure this just looks like yet another attack on them. But we cannot let the GOP become the "dominant governing party in the country for a generation" as Karl Rove would like. Effective single party rule would be indescribably bad, no matter where you are on the political spectrum. Of course, ask Republicans, and none of them would admit how much they'd love this single-party scenario. Just like a company that repeats the mantra of "competition is good," when they know full well how nice having a monopoly is when they can get away with it.
The only hope of putting a kink in their plans is to vote Bush out of office next November. It pains me to say it, because they're weak and I hate them too, but the Democrats are our only hope. The problem is, I'm afraid that if the Democrats actually started taking a stand and taking action, it could backfire and they could be left even weaker than before. The Republicans are masters of letting the Democrats fuck themselves, and I'm afraid that even if the Dems did the right thing, they could end up accelerating exactly what I fear. Furthermore, even if Bush was pushed out, it may not completely derail what's been going on, only delaying the inevitable.
I hope I am just crazy, and this is just the ranting of someone who doesn't know shit about politics. But we are so totally fucked if I'm right, so I'm not letting go of this.
Posted by
Well, different
@
17:16
The saga continues. Lots of random comments on this one.
Nearly one in five people polled are against removing the monument? How fucking stupid are we? I'll tell 'ya - real goddamn stupid.
What is this pussy shit that it's been moved? You're supposed to be getting it the fuck out of there, end of story.
"It is a sad day in our country when the moral foundation of our law and the acknowledgment of God has to be hidden from public view..." No, you fucking asshole, being "hidden from public view" is not the issue. I sincerely doubt that Christianity is going to be forced underground because of this. The government may be Judeo-Christian biased, BUT IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PUTTING THAT BIAS ON DISPLAY FOR EVERYONE TO SEE!.
Calling for people to come see "where the 10 Commandments once stood"? How fucking bankrupt are these peoples' lives? I'll tell 'ya - reall goddamn bankrupt. You brought your whole family from Alaska for this shit? Get the fuck out of here and go back to work.
"I think they're going to be sorry they cooperated with this act." What kind of an asshole makes bullshit threats like this? An ignorant, Christian asshole, that's what kind. All that this guy and the rest of Moore's followers care about is pushing their beliefs on everyone else and seeing those beliefs being reinforced in public forum just so everyone can see how wonderful and holy they are.
Here's another article that says people were praying while laying face-down on the pavement. Speaking of bullshit threats, I think it's Michelin-on-Skull Time!
Four men linking arms and chanting? Sounds pretty fucking gay for a bunch of Christian Conservatives.
"They can move it out of view, but they can't move it out of our hearts." That's the FUCKING POINT, asshole! No one is trying to remove God, or the Commandments, or any of that bullshit from your heart. They're just trying to maintain Separation of Church and State, not Separation of Church and Joe Christian.
Okay, that's it. Enough cheap shots from me; I'm tired.
Nearly one in five people polled are against removing the monument? How fucking stupid are we? I'll tell 'ya - real goddamn stupid.
What is this pussy shit that it's been moved? You're supposed to be getting it the fuck out of there, end of story.
"It is a sad day in our country when the moral foundation of our law and the acknowledgment of God has to be hidden from public view..." No, you fucking asshole, being "hidden from public view" is not the issue. I sincerely doubt that Christianity is going to be forced underground because of this. The government may be Judeo-Christian biased, BUT IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PUTTING THAT BIAS ON DISPLAY FOR EVERYONE TO SEE!.
Calling for people to come see "where the 10 Commandments once stood"? How fucking bankrupt are these peoples' lives? I'll tell 'ya - reall goddamn bankrupt. You brought your whole family from Alaska for this shit? Get the fuck out of here and go back to work.
"I think they're going to be sorry they cooperated with this act." What kind of an asshole makes bullshit threats like this? An ignorant, Christian asshole, that's what kind. All that this guy and the rest of Moore's followers care about is pushing their beliefs on everyone else and seeing those beliefs being reinforced in public forum just so everyone can see how wonderful and holy they are.
Here's another article that says people were praying while laying face-down on the pavement. Speaking of bullshit threats, I think it's Michelin-on-Skull Time!
Four men linking arms and chanting? Sounds pretty fucking gay for a bunch of Christian Conservatives.
"They can move it out of view, but they can't move it out of our hearts." That's the FUCKING POINT, asshole! No one is trying to remove God, or the Commandments, or any of that bullshit from your heart. They're just trying to maintain Separation of Church and State, not Separation of Church and Joe Christian.
Okay, that's it. Enough cheap shots from me; I'm tired.
Posted by
Well, different
@
16:40
Why don't men watch women's sports? Because they're fucking boring.
A lot of it isn't just because they're women, or unattractive, or whatever. Sure, I hate women, but that's only because they fall into a larger category known as "people." Don't get me wrong; I am not a simple misogynist, I am a misanthrope. The attractive thing really doesn't matter to me, because the Baywatch Principle comes into play. Even if there are some hotties running around, I'm not going to watch if the stuff beyond the T&A isn't interesting.
Another problem with women's sports for me is that they always let women play the most fucking uninteresting sports out there. Golf, soccer, basketball, you name it. I don't want to watch men play these sports.
Soccer is just fucking boring as shit to me, and I know it's not because of low scoring because I love hockey and 0-0 pitcher's duels. Actually, the only time I did get interested in soccer was women's soccer, when our team won the World Cup. That, however, failed to inspire me to watch more soccer, women's or otherwise. The same goes for men's basketball; I only enjoyed watching the Bulls play when they were good. Wasn't enough to get me interested in the sport in general.
The WNBA is a particular sore spot for me. Every year, around the same time, I ask my friends "Hey, did the WNBA finally fold?" only to find out that the new season starts in three days.
I probably speak for no one else, but you wanna know how to get me to watch women's sports? Give me something I've been clamoring for for a long time: women's baseball. No, I'm dead fucking serious. Check this out.
Major League Baseball has been pissing me off for years now. Mainly, because it's all about helping the hitter and fucking the pitcher. I could swear that the mound is nearly ground level now. New ballparks are being designed with smaller dimensions, older parks are having the fences moved in. Most likely rampant drug use is being ignored. At Fenway, they fucking lowered the green monster to add seats.
How often do you see guys steal bases anymore?
I just think it fucking sucks to see so many teams living and dying by the solo home-run. My solution? Kick it turn of the 20th century school, and bring back the dead ball. I know, not gonna happen.
So my other solution? Let women play baseball. I'm not talking about that softball bullshit, I mean real baseball. I know it won't happen in the big leagues, but it seems like it'd be feasible if not for all this patriarchal shit we have laying around. I could just be over-idealizing, and women wouldn't be able to make it in the Majors, but I doubt the possibility has been fully explored. And if breaking the sex barrier in the Majors doesn't happen, give the women their own league.
The thing is, I think women in baseball could be great hitters. And by hitters, I mean pure hitters who go for average and not power. Is there much more to hitting besides form, good eyesight, and good reflexes? I think female athletes could easily handle that. Plus, there would undoubtedly be power hitters as well, but we'd have a much better mix now to keep it from being all about the home run. Pitching is another issue, but I'm sure we can find some players out there who have some arm strength. Maybe not enough to pitch against men, so I definitely don't see that happening in the Majors. Defense and baserunning are more issues; against men it may be a mis-match, but straight women on women (and we all know how much we like to see that) teams would be no problem.
Again, don't give me any shit here, because I honestly don't know how well women athletes could compete against men. I have seen no studies, and have conducted no tests of my own. I'm just going with what little intuition and common sense that I have.
Oh, and if we do get women's baseball going, give them some real pants for their uniforms. I love looking at a nice pair of legs more than the next guy, but these women need to be able to slide, for Christ's sake.
A lot of it isn't just because they're women, or unattractive, or whatever. Sure, I hate women, but that's only because they fall into a larger category known as "people." Don't get me wrong; I am not a simple misogynist, I am a misanthrope. The attractive thing really doesn't matter to me, because the Baywatch Principle comes into play. Even if there are some hotties running around, I'm not going to watch if the stuff beyond the T&A isn't interesting.
Another problem with women's sports for me is that they always let women play the most fucking uninteresting sports out there. Golf, soccer, basketball, you name it. I don't want to watch men play these sports.
Soccer is just fucking boring as shit to me, and I know it's not because of low scoring because I love hockey and 0-0 pitcher's duels. Actually, the only time I did get interested in soccer was women's soccer, when our team won the World Cup. That, however, failed to inspire me to watch more soccer, women's or otherwise. The same goes for men's basketball; I only enjoyed watching the Bulls play when they were good. Wasn't enough to get me interested in the sport in general.
The WNBA is a particular sore spot for me. Every year, around the same time, I ask my friends "Hey, did the WNBA finally fold?" only to find out that the new season starts in three days.
I probably speak for no one else, but you wanna know how to get me to watch women's sports? Give me something I've been clamoring for for a long time: women's baseball. No, I'm dead fucking serious. Check this out.
Major League Baseball has been pissing me off for years now. Mainly, because it's all about helping the hitter and fucking the pitcher. I could swear that the mound is nearly ground level now. New ballparks are being designed with smaller dimensions, older parks are having the fences moved in. Most likely rampant drug use is being ignored. At Fenway, they fucking lowered the green monster to add seats.
How often do you see guys steal bases anymore?
I just think it fucking sucks to see so many teams living and dying by the solo home-run. My solution? Kick it turn of the 20th century school, and bring back the dead ball. I know, not gonna happen.
So my other solution? Let women play baseball. I'm not talking about that softball bullshit, I mean real baseball. I know it won't happen in the big leagues, but it seems like it'd be feasible if not for all this patriarchal shit we have laying around. I could just be over-idealizing, and women wouldn't be able to make it in the Majors, but I doubt the possibility has been fully explored. And if breaking the sex barrier in the Majors doesn't happen, give the women their own league.
The thing is, I think women in baseball could be great hitters. And by hitters, I mean pure hitters who go for average and not power. Is there much more to hitting besides form, good eyesight, and good reflexes? I think female athletes could easily handle that. Plus, there would undoubtedly be power hitters as well, but we'd have a much better mix now to keep it from being all about the home run. Pitching is another issue, but I'm sure we can find some players out there who have some arm strength. Maybe not enough to pitch against men, so I definitely don't see that happening in the Majors. Defense and baserunning are more issues; against men it may be a mis-match, but straight women on women (and we all know how much we like to see that) teams would be no problem.
Again, don't give me any shit here, because I honestly don't know how well women athletes could compete against men. I have seen no studies, and have conducted no tests of my own. I'm just going with what little intuition and common sense that I have.
Oh, and if we do get women's baseball going, give them some real pants for their uniforms. I love looking at a nice pair of legs more than the next guy, but these women need to be able to slide, for Christ's sake.
Posted by
Well, different
@
14:53
Some people have too much time on their hands, and this is coming from me. I came across this example a long time ago, but for some reason was thinking about it today, and decided to post a link.
Posted by
Well, different
@
13:52
Yeah, I know the last few posts were nothing but meaningless complaints. I realize that I'm not helping anything just by bitching, and I certainly can't change the past. Really, though, I just don't want to let up on how shitty of a president Bush is. I don't want to start ignoring the fact that the Administration has gotten us into so much fucking trouble that it boggles the mind. Just hoping that there are other individual complainers out there, and with enough of us, we can make a chorus loud enough to be heard. I know it's a pipe dream, because no matter how pissed we managed to get people, the same dumb fuck voters will fall for the same campaign promises and the same attack ads come next November.
Oh, I know it isn't just the voters. I know I don't rail on Democrats anywhere near as much as Republicans, but I'll reiterate here that I fucking hate the Democrats, too. If nothing else, I hate them because they can't even behave like a worthy opposition. Among other reasons, I hate them because they are so fucking out of touch. Take for example Dick Gephardt, who's all incensed that we're not doing enough to get other countries to pitch and help out in reconstructing Iraq, and who is just trying to make himself look like big, bad Mr. Presidential candidate. What exactly is those other countries' motivation, dick? Yeah, it'd be nice if others would help out of the goodness of their hearts, but they're not going to since we have routinely given them the finger whenever they wanted a say in things. "You guys can have a say in things when we say so. Until then, go sit in the corner and don't touch anything France, Germany, and the rest of the fucking world." Do you know how much harder that makes it for people like Colin Powell to get shit done?
You know another thing, dick? We might not be having all these fucking problems if you and your fucking pussy congress buddies hadn't just handed over the decision to go after Iraq back in October. Lots of your Democrat buddies voted against it, but you sure didn't, dick.
Okay, yeah, Bush would have gotten his way no matter what, but did they have to make it so goddamn easy? Couldn't they have made it look like some people over here were pissed about this war? Made it look like we aren't all a bunch of rubber stamps for Bush? Because, really, that could help us with the rest of the world, if they didn't think that Emperor Bush was calling all the shots. Even though he is. Well, he really isn't; it's all the people working "under" him that are in charge. But you know what? Half of America doesn't know who the fuck Paul Wolfowitz is, and neither does the rest of the world. So, Bush becomes the face of evil who ends up representing not just his government, but all of us to the rest of the world. If we showed that we as a country could stand up to the neocon entity known as "Bush," maybe other countries would be more sympathetic towards us. Maybe they'd say "You know, those Americans are trying real hard to get their shit together, but that Bush keeps fucking it up. I don't want to look like I'm supporting Bush, but let's help those nice people in America out a little." instead of "What? Bush wants our help? Fuck America - they aren't getting shit."
Also, have you noticed how cool I am, and I know exactly what foreign leaders are saying? I totally feel like one of those baseball announcers who sees a meeting at the mound and says "Well, what he's saying to the pitcher is to scratch his balls some more and then spit on that newborn in the first row," when in fact they have no fucking clue what's being said on the field.
Oh, I know it isn't just the voters. I know I don't rail on Democrats anywhere near as much as Republicans, but I'll reiterate here that I fucking hate the Democrats, too. If nothing else, I hate them because they can't even behave like a worthy opposition. Among other reasons, I hate them because they are so fucking out of touch. Take for example Dick Gephardt, who's all incensed that we're not doing enough to get other countries to pitch and help out in reconstructing Iraq, and who is just trying to make himself look like big, bad Mr. Presidential candidate. What exactly is those other countries' motivation, dick? Yeah, it'd be nice if others would help out of the goodness of their hearts, but they're not going to since we have routinely given them the finger whenever they wanted a say in things. "You guys can have a say in things when we say so. Until then, go sit in the corner and don't touch anything France, Germany, and the rest of the fucking world." Do you know how much harder that makes it for people like Colin Powell to get shit done?
You know another thing, dick? We might not be having all these fucking problems if you and your fucking pussy congress buddies hadn't just handed over the decision to go after Iraq back in October. Lots of your Democrat buddies voted against it, but you sure didn't, dick.
Okay, yeah, Bush would have gotten his way no matter what, but did they have to make it so goddamn easy? Couldn't they have made it look like some people over here were pissed about this war? Made it look like we aren't all a bunch of rubber stamps for Bush? Because, really, that could help us with the rest of the world, if they didn't think that Emperor Bush was calling all the shots. Even though he is. Well, he really isn't; it's all the people working "under" him that are in charge. But you know what? Half of America doesn't know who the fuck Paul Wolfowitz is, and neither does the rest of the world. So, Bush becomes the face of evil who ends up representing not just his government, but all of us to the rest of the world. If we showed that we as a country could stand up to the neocon entity known as "Bush," maybe other countries would be more sympathetic towards us. Maybe they'd say "You know, those Americans are trying real hard to get their shit together, but that Bush keeps fucking it up. I don't want to look like I'm supporting Bush, but let's help those nice people in America out a little." instead of "What? Bush wants our help? Fuck America - they aren't getting shit."
Also, have you noticed how cool I am, and I know exactly what foreign leaders are saying? I totally feel like one of those baseball announcers who sees a meeting at the mound and says "Well, what he's saying to the pitcher is to scratch his balls some more and then spit on that newborn in the first row," when in fact they have no fucking clue what's being said on the field.
Posted by
Well, different
@
04:07
Tuesday, August 26, 2003
Yeah, this is a start, but nowhere fucking near what we need to prevent more Enrons and WorldComs. Why don't we start by taking a good, hard look at the accounting profession? As Arianna Huffington repeatedly points out in her book Pigs at the Trough, the same firm that does accounting work for a company can also do consulting work for that company. I'm sure that the implied conflict of interest is imaginary, and the consulting and accounting wings never work together to bolster the full company's bottom line.
Also, Michael Capellas has no business talking about "public trust." This is the man who let the company he was CEO of at the time, Compaq, get bought out by Hewlett-Packard. Don't let the papers fool you, this was a buyout and not a merger. Not long after the companies merged, Capellas left for, as we know, WorldCom. I have never worked for Compaq, so maybe it's just me, but I would have felt shit on if I were those former Compaq employees when Crapellas abandoned them. He was at least a face for their side, and a counterpart to Fuhrer Fiorina, HP's CEO. Once he left, that was shot to shit, and they were on their own. If they didn't get laid off, of course.
Also, Michael Capellas has no business talking about "public trust." This is the man who let the company he was CEO of at the time, Compaq, get bought out by Hewlett-Packard. Don't let the papers fool you, this was a buyout and not a merger. Not long after the companies merged, Capellas left for, as we know, WorldCom. I have never worked for Compaq, so maybe it's just me, but I would have felt shit on if I were those former Compaq employees when Crapellas abandoned them. He was at least a face for their side, and a counterpart to Fuhrer Fiorina, HP's CEO. Once he left, that was shot to shit, and they were on their own. If they didn't get laid off, of course.
Posted by
Well, different
@
21:47
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
