Saturday, September 06, 2003
Again, my 'blog is a beacon for horny guys jerking off, as evidenced by this AOL search:
best way to mastubate?
best way to mastubate?
Posted by
Well, different
@
17:06
So I made my views on online file sharing known back in an April 21st post. Here's today's example as to why the recording industry is wrong, and nothing but a bunch of greedy fucks who are too stupid to figure out a decent way to cash in on P2P, and so they have to go blitzkrieg on anyone they can find.
Yeah, there's a lot of porn out there on P2P networks. And, unfortunately, there is child porn out there as well. As pointed out in that article (and not like you need to be reminded), there is plenty of porn of all kinds to be found on the internet. If we're going to start regulating and shutting down P2P networks, than the same is going to have to go for the rest of the 'net, and I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon.
Saying they're working to keep kids from finding porn, child or otherwise, is just as much bullshit as those who go after the internet in general for the same thing. Is it easier to get porn on P2P networks? You could make a case for that. But that doesn't mean that just because it's out there that adults or children are necessarily downloading it. Some, yes. It wouldn't be there if there wasn't some sort of demand. However, as was also pointed out, rarely do you ever download porn on accident. When you see MPEG filenames that have references to children and sexual acts, you have a pretty good idea as to what it is. Also, I don't think that many are trying to lure kids into looking at child porn on P2P like that guy I posted a link on a couple of days ago. Again, what would the fucking point of that be?
Those who sexually assault children really are the lowest of the low, and they deserve to die. Going after P2P networks and developers does nothing to stop these people. An attempt by the recording industry to say they're fighting P2P to protect children is disgusting. Again, I don't even have to tell anyone that this is just a thinly veiled attempt to protect their bottom line. They would personally rape children to protect their profits. R Kelly might do it for free. But if you're going to be a money grubbing prick, at least don't lie about it.
Also, sorry R. Sure, you peed on a 14 year old, and that's not exactly rape (unless you forced her), and while she was a minor 14 isn't exactly a 'child' like some who are abused in porn and otherwise. Doesn't mean what you did is OK, but to imply that you're a kiddy raper isn't really fair, unless of course if at some point you have raped kids. Unfortunately for you, you were the quickest example of someone in music who I could think of that's into the young'uns.
Yeah, there's a lot of porn out there on P2P networks. And, unfortunately, there is child porn out there as well. As pointed out in that article (and not like you need to be reminded), there is plenty of porn of all kinds to be found on the internet. If we're going to start regulating and shutting down P2P networks, than the same is going to have to go for the rest of the 'net, and I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon.
Saying they're working to keep kids from finding porn, child or otherwise, is just as much bullshit as those who go after the internet in general for the same thing. Is it easier to get porn on P2P networks? You could make a case for that. But that doesn't mean that just because it's out there that adults or children are necessarily downloading it. Some, yes. It wouldn't be there if there wasn't some sort of demand. However, as was also pointed out, rarely do you ever download porn on accident. When you see MPEG filenames that have references to children and sexual acts, you have a pretty good idea as to what it is. Also, I don't think that many are trying to lure kids into looking at child porn on P2P like that guy I posted a link on a couple of days ago. Again, what would the fucking point of that be?
Those who sexually assault children really are the lowest of the low, and they deserve to die. Going after P2P networks and developers does nothing to stop these people. An attempt by the recording industry to say they're fighting P2P to protect children is disgusting. Again, I don't even have to tell anyone that this is just a thinly veiled attempt to protect their bottom line. They would personally rape children to protect their profits. R Kelly might do it for free. But if you're going to be a money grubbing prick, at least don't lie about it.
Also, sorry R. Sure, you peed on a 14 year old, and that's not exactly rape (unless you forced her), and while she was a minor 14 isn't exactly a 'child' like some who are abused in porn and otherwise. Doesn't mean what you did is OK, but to imply that you're a kiddy raper isn't really fair, unless of course if at some point you have raped kids. Unfortunately for you, you were the quickest example of someone in music who I could think of that's into the young'uns.
Posted by
Well, different
@
16:28
Nothing cheers 'ya up like waking up to a story about dead baby turtles.
Still, nothing will piss me off as much as this one story that ran on our local news several years ago. It was about a bunch of kittens, and they were sick for some reason or other - I can't quite remember. Anyway, it's a bunch of kittens, so naturally I'm like "awwwww..." But you know what happened at the end of the story? The kittens died. You don't run a fucking story about cute kitties who die in the end! I know it's the fucking news, but where is my happy ending? When it comes to kittens, no happy ending, no story, got it?
Although I was bitter and disillusioned at the time, I think I still had a shred of hope and joy left in me, but that story destroyed it.
Still, nothing will piss me off as much as this one story that ran on our local news several years ago. It was about a bunch of kittens, and they were sick for some reason or other - I can't quite remember. Anyway, it's a bunch of kittens, so naturally I'm like "awwwww..." But you know what happened at the end of the story? The kittens died. You don't run a fucking story about cute kitties who die in the end! I know it's the fucking news, but where is my happy ending? When it comes to kittens, no happy ending, no story, got it?
Although I was bitter and disillusioned at the time, I think I still had a shred of hope and joy left in me, but that story destroyed it.
Posted by
Well, different
@
13:48
Friday, September 05, 2003
Hey, what the fuck does Jimmy Carter know about world peace?
Oh. Decades of diplomatic experience. Nobel Peace Prize. Right.
Oh. Decades of diplomatic experience. Nobel Peace Prize. Right.
Posted by
Well, different
@
18:47
Okay, I think I may have come across a better, also free, commenting solution: BlogSpeak. I can format the comment line text however the fuck I want, and if they're tracking IPs or any of that shit, at least they don't show it in the fucking comment window. I'm probably going to switch over to this once I figure out what their catch is and I get motivated to make the change.
Posted by
Well, different
@
18:29
Way to go, Bush Administration. You see, this is why you don't spend a bunch of time calling down everyone's ass, because it makes it a lot more difficult when you have to turn around and kiss all those asses.
You know, as much as I hate the administration, I've always had a begrudging respect for them. Even if I disagree with someone, I can respect them if they're intelligent, well organized, and can get shit done. This quagmire in Iraq really has me doubting the few points that I gave the administration. After all, wasn't the idea to set up a pro-US, pro-Israel government in Iraq? That isn't looking horribly promising, now that Iraq actually is a breeding ground for terrorism. The Bush administration is just like a spoiled child: it wants to have its way without having to wait or do anything on its own. It really does seem like they expected Saddam to go away, and magically Iraq would be re-born as if it had been struck by the Genesis Device. And, if you saw Star Trek III, thus having caught that reference, well, you know how the Genesis Planet ends up.
I got to thinking, and maybe the Administration's goals are even more abstruse than I thought. Maybe getting rid of Saddam was just supposed to be a short-term fix for something, and they don't care how Iraq ends up. Short term fix for what? Beats me; even I'm not that evil. I know, it doesn't make any sense. Why wouldn't they be interested in setting up a US puppet government? But if that's what they're trying to do, why didn't they have one or two meetings (at least) before the war to discuss how things would go over? I just can't make heads or tails of it.
Then I got to thinking, maybe the Bush Administration is in al Qaeda's pocket. Or something like that. Seriously, because they seem hell bent on destroying this country. Massive debt looming thanks to shitty domestic and shitty foreign policy, coupled with an entire world pissed off at us. And you know what? This is just quiet time. With as bad as things are now, this is probably just the calm before the storm.
You know, as much as I hate the administration, I've always had a begrudging respect for them. Even if I disagree with someone, I can respect them if they're intelligent, well organized, and can get shit done. This quagmire in Iraq really has me doubting the few points that I gave the administration. After all, wasn't the idea to set up a pro-US, pro-Israel government in Iraq? That isn't looking horribly promising, now that Iraq actually is a breeding ground for terrorism. The Bush administration is just like a spoiled child: it wants to have its way without having to wait or do anything on its own. It really does seem like they expected Saddam to go away, and magically Iraq would be re-born as if it had been struck by the Genesis Device. And, if you saw Star Trek III, thus having caught that reference, well, you know how the Genesis Planet ends up.
I got to thinking, and maybe the Administration's goals are even more abstruse than I thought. Maybe getting rid of Saddam was just supposed to be a short-term fix for something, and they don't care how Iraq ends up. Short term fix for what? Beats me; even I'm not that evil. I know, it doesn't make any sense. Why wouldn't they be interested in setting up a US puppet government? But if that's what they're trying to do, why didn't they have one or two meetings (at least) before the war to discuss how things would go over? I just can't make heads or tails of it.
Then I got to thinking, maybe the Bush Administration is in al Qaeda's pocket. Or something like that. Seriously, because they seem hell bent on destroying this country. Massive debt looming thanks to shitty domestic and shitty foreign policy, coupled with an entire world pissed off at us. And you know what? This is just quiet time. With as bad as things are now, this is probably just the calm before the storm.
Posted by
Well, different
@
18:14
Okay, this may be one of my proudest moments... ever. Here's an AOL search that brought someone here:
how to mastubate longer
I also got another hit thanks to "boyfucker." Super.
how to mastubate longer
I also got another hit thanks to "boyfucker." Super.
Posted by
Well, different
@
17:47
So, the latest google searches to generate hits...
hoax marcellus wallace soul
sexy student fuck by teacher secretary with manager story
outlaw volleyball all costume code (Yahoo)
hoax marcellus wallace soul
sexy student fuck by teacher secretary with manager story
outlaw volleyball all costume code (Yahoo)
Posted by
Well, different
@
06:07
Thursday, September 04, 2003
I also love Paul Krugman, and I'm not afraid to admit that, either.
Posted by
Well, different
@
23:57
Quick show of hands: who pays any attention to what the government says about possible terrorist attacks?
Posted by
Well, different
@
23:49
Wednesday, September 03, 2003
Okay, here's a question: why would you want to lure children to a pr0n site in the first place? The only way you're going to make money is if the kid gets ahold of a credit card. Granted, this is possible, but it's not like the kid is going to get away with it. Well, actually, I suppose they could. The credit card bill comes, the wife gets pissed, and the husband blames it on the kids, which the wife natually doesn't buy. Shit, now that I think about it, that's the perfect crime. Oh, except for the fact that kids don't care about pr0n besides maybe the normal curiousity we all had when we were younger.
One one hand, this kinda bothers me, because it's like, well, why the fuck aren't parents just doing a better job of watching their kids online and explaining shit to them when things don't work out according to plan? It's not like you can't do a search for something completely innocuous and get 1,000 sites returned for "Backdoor Fisting Sluts," so it's hard to completely shield them unless you just keep them off the 'net. Anyway, parents really need to be more aware of this shit, and prepared for what do do when their kids do come across pr0n. You know, at least the really young ones who shouldn't be seeing this stuff. Besides, once they get to a certain age, they've probably seen old Playboys at a friend's house anyway.
Still, it does seem like this guy was trying to get kids to come to pr0n sites with things like misspelling Disney. Except for the Britney Spears websites - anyone going there is obviously looking for jackoff material. So, fuck it, go ahead and go after the guy. There's no excuse for trying to get kids into pr0n - many of them will get into it anyway when the time is right.
One one hand, this kinda bothers me, because it's like, well, why the fuck aren't parents just doing a better job of watching their kids online and explaining shit to them when things don't work out according to plan? It's not like you can't do a search for something completely innocuous and get 1,000 sites returned for "Backdoor Fisting Sluts," so it's hard to completely shield them unless you just keep them off the 'net. Anyway, parents really need to be more aware of this shit, and prepared for what do do when their kids do come across pr0n. You know, at least the really young ones who shouldn't be seeing this stuff. Besides, once they get to a certain age, they've probably seen old Playboys at a friend's house anyway.
Still, it does seem like this guy was trying to get kids to come to pr0n sites with things like misspelling Disney. Except for the Britney Spears websites - anyone going there is obviously looking for jackoff material. So, fuck it, go ahead and go after the guy. There's no excuse for trying to get kids into pr0n - many of them will get into it anyway when the time is right.
Posted by
Well, different
@
21:08
This has got to be the saddest fucking 'blog I've ever seen. I may remove the link soon, because I really don't want someone's shitty Enterprise wet dream fanfiction getting a few free hits off of me. Still, I think you've gotta see this for yourself.
Okay, so I tried writing my own shitty wet dream Trek fanfics at one point, and always think about continuing the effort, but I'll admit up front that what I've come up with is fucking awful.
Okay, so I tried writing my own shitty wet dream Trek fanfics at one point, and always think about continuing the effort, but I'll admit up front that what I've come up with is fucking awful.
Posted by
Well, different
@
17:42
So I was looking through the list of referring webpages for visitors to my site. Some people got here by doing Google searches using the following search terms:
vince clortho
"wil wheaton" lawsuit
"flash mob" "popular culture"
boyfucker
stupid duplo blocks
fuck g (MSN search)
doax jpe (MSN search)
It's nice to see that I'm using language that allows pedophiles to find my 'blog. Looks like it's time to start using more filthy language, just for the hell of it. My new goal is to insert several porn references everyday, like "barely legal teens" or "tight teenage pussy" or "hot asian whores." Hey, other 'bloggers have found this to be an effective way to get people to their site; time to start putting it to more effective use here at Fuck Everything.
vince clortho
"wil wheaton" lawsuit
"flash mob" "popular culture"
boyfucker
stupid duplo blocks
fuck g (MSN search)
doax jpe (MSN search)
It's nice to see that I'm using language that allows pedophiles to find my 'blog. Looks like it's time to start using more filthy language, just for the hell of it. My new goal is to insert several porn references everyday, like "barely legal teens" or "tight teenage pussy" or "hot asian whores." Hey, other 'bloggers have found this to be an effective way to get people to their site; time to start putting it to more effective use here at Fuck Everything.
Posted by
Well, different
@
17:06
Poor little rich boy.
Geez, working in the White House has gotta suck now, eh? Women have to wear skirts below the knee? Sure, micro-minis probably aren't appropriate for the seat of the United States government, but Christ, what a bunch of repressed motherfuckers.
You know, I was walking behind a pretty girl today wearing a nice skirt. And I was thinking to myself "I like skirts. Long ones, short ones, medium length ones. It's all good." And yes, you can see the quality of my thought processes right there. But I've realized more and more that I'd really like to have a girlfriend, if nothing else, to dress her up in nice things. I think this desire is pretty obvious from my beauty pageant ideas.
Okay, granted, I wouldn't exactly be the one dressing her up; she's obviously going to be making her own choices. But if she has good taste (which is basically a pre-req), it'll almost seem like I have some control. "Hey, I would have picked that one out!"
You know, I just cannot imagine why women don't go for me.
Geez, working in the White House has gotta suck now, eh? Women have to wear skirts below the knee? Sure, micro-minis probably aren't appropriate for the seat of the United States government, but Christ, what a bunch of repressed motherfuckers.
You know, I was walking behind a pretty girl today wearing a nice skirt. And I was thinking to myself "I like skirts. Long ones, short ones, medium length ones. It's all good." And yes, you can see the quality of my thought processes right there. But I've realized more and more that I'd really like to have a girlfriend, if nothing else, to dress her up in nice things. I think this desire is pretty obvious from my beauty pageant ideas.
Okay, granted, I wouldn't exactly be the one dressing her up; she's obviously going to be making her own choices. But if she has good taste (which is basically a pre-req), it'll almost seem like I have some control. "Hey, I would have picked that one out!"
You know, I just cannot imagine why women don't go for me.
Posted by
Well, different
@
15:55
Maureen Dowd, telling it like it is. I love this woman, and I'm not ashamed to admit it.
Posted by
Well, different
@
14:10
This is great news, because home schooled kids never turn out socially inept or fucking retarded.
Of course, with all this standardized testing bullshit, the gap is closing. Still, you need to suffer through the hell of school if you ever hope to be as bitter and pissed off as me. Um, wait. I meant if you ever hope to build a strong character. Or something.
Spelling bees? Geography bees? These things are fucking worthless. Their only purpose is to give kids and parents something that's fucking worthless to brag about.
Of course, with all this standardized testing bullshit, the gap is closing. Still, you need to suffer through the hell of school if you ever hope to be as bitter and pissed off as me. Um, wait. I meant if you ever hope to build a strong character. Or something.
Spelling bees? Geography bees? These things are fucking worthless. Their only purpose is to give kids and parents something that's fucking worthless to brag about.
Posted by
Well, different
@
14:01
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
